Levels of Picture Engagement How Low Can You Go?

Some pictures we remember. Most we don’t. They go in one eye and out the other, to steal a phrase. Still fewer open our eyes and change our perceptions.

As an illustration professor, I’m often advocating for pictures that are more resonant. I’m looking for deeper images – ones that are more than a just a pretty picture. So to help make my point, I’ve been trying to picture how images can deliver more for the viewer. I tell my students, that the more you put into a picture, the more a viewer can take out. But I’m not talking about more details, or more complication. Confusion and exhaustion are not good ways to communicate. It’s what’s behind the image that counts – the depth – the layers of meaning.

Imagine that there are three levels of engagement that a picture can offer, and that the very best illustrations reach all three.

(Bob) Dylan by Milton Glaser, 1966

Working Pictures: A Change in Perspective

Great pictures work because they are designed to work. They don’t just happen by luck or by accident. In this Working Pictures series, elements and decisions of picture design are closely examined to better understand how images are made to “work.” 
Case in Point: Chris Ware’s “Threshold”
Ware-newtown-shooting-465
Background
Chris Ware is.
Ware-back-to-school-465
Choices
Wisely chosen concepts wedded to artful images make for memorable and effective pictures. The communication success of an image is the result of the decisions made regarding these factors.  

1. Concepts  

-Subtlety.  A strength of this picture is that it looks innocent at first glance.  It turns a conventional autumnal scene on its head by adding a small, surprising, creepy element… the carving of one pumpkin from the inside out!  The idea however, is very small in the picture, and very quiet too.